← All work

MEDSIM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Clinical video
database redesign.

Making a clinical simulation archive easier to search, organize, and share.

My contribution
Information architecture
Usability testing
Selected UI design
Team
3 designers
Timeline
Sep 2022–Jan 2023
Deliverable
High-fidelity prototype

FROM RECORDINGS TO RESOURCES

One archive.
Four perspectives.

Students · Faculty · Researchers · Technicians

  1. 01FindSearch relevant recordings
  2. 02ReviewWatch and take notes
  3. 03Collect & shareReturn to useful material

Within a three-person team, I focused on information architecture and usability testing, and contributed to part of the interface design.

01 / THE PROBLEM

Even finding one video
was a challenge.

Older simulation recordings lived in Google Drive. Their searchable information lived in a separate spreadsheet. Finding a recording meant switching between both.

  1. 01
    Google SheetsGoogle Sheets

    Search the spreadsheet

    Find a matching record.

  2. 02
    Recording date

    Copy the date

    Use it to locate the session.

  3. 03
    Google DriveGoogle Drive

    Find the Drive folder

    Switch tools and search again.

  4. 04
    Video file

    Identify the video

    Interpret camera-generated filenames.

Missing context

Inconsistent titles and notes made recordings difficult to identify.

A workflow to learn

Users needed to understand the spreadsheet, folder structure, and naming conventions.

Access depended on others

Students often relied on faculty or technicians to retrieve videos.

Based on interviews with a faculty member and a technician, plus an observed search session with a graduate student.

02 / INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

Different roles and needs.
Bringing their workflows together.

The archive needed to support people using the recordings and the people maintaining them.

01

Students

Find and review relevant simulation recordings.

02

Faculty

Assemble and share material for teaching.

03

Researchers

Collect recordings across sessions and years.

04

Technicians

Maintain video information and manage access.

Learning & research

Find → Review → Collect → Share

Archive management

Upload → Describe → Maintain → Manage access

Original team story map connecting search, result review, collections, sharing, and feedback tasks
Original team story map: connecting tasks across user roles. Select the image to view at full size.

03 / DESIGN DECISIONS

Make the archive useful,
one decision at a time.

01 / SEARCH

Start with searchable content.

We prioritized metadata and audio transcription, balancing search usefulness with processing cost. Image search and AI-generated tags remained secondary options.

PRIORITIZEMetadata + transcripts

Build on structured information and spoken content.

EXPLORE SECONDImage search + AI tags

Powerful options with greater processing cost.

View the original search trade-off diagram
Original design decision diagram comparing metadata, AI tags, image search, and audio transcription against availability, accuracy, cost, and speed
Question–Options–Criteria analysis from the project record. Select to enlarge.
02 / ORGANIZATION

Keep useful recordings together.

Collections give teaching and research work a place to continue: save relevant videos, return to them, and share the selected material.

  1. Find relevant videos
  2. Save to a collection
  3. Return or share
03 / MANAGEMENT

A dedicated path for technicians.

Managing the archive requires different tools from browsing it. We separated content and account management from the learning workflow.

ContentUpload recordings
Update metadata
AccessManage accounts
Review permissions

04 / USABILITY TESTING

Watching was clear.
Taking notes was not.

Five participants tested the general-user paper prototype. The viewing-and-note-taking task exposed the greatest difficulty.

General-user task ratings 5 participants · maximum 15 per task
Log in14/15
Search: anesthesia view13/15
Add to collection12/15
View video & take notes8/15
Copy shareable link14/15

Task rating scale: 3 = completed easily · 2 = completed with difficulty · 1 = could not complete.

FINDING → DESIGN CHANGE

Make note-taking discoverable.

Two participants could not complete the task; three struggled. The report identified confusion about where to take notes.

Final prototype responseOne entry point for notes and comments.
TECHNICIAN WORKFLOW · 1 PARTICIPANT

Make the entrance explicit.

The mid-fidelity test revealed difficulty finding the role-specific login. The final prototype added the label “technician portal.”

What still needed work

Upload and metadata-update sequences required learning. Clearer guidance and testing with experienced clinical users remained important next steps.

05 / FINAL DESIGN

A connected archive
for clinical learning.

The high-fidelity prototype brings search, video review, collections, and management into one system.

What I took forward

Information structure and discoverability need to work together. Making a video searchable is only the beginning; users also need clear ways to review, save, and share it.

The project concluded with a high-fidelity prototype. Testing did not include medical specialists; production performance was not evaluated.

← Back to selected workExplore Vizard ↗